Humboldt Waterkeeper
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Waterkeeper Alliance
  • Humboldt Bay
    • Geography
    • Wildlife
    • Bay Issues
    • Photo Gallery
  • Programs
    • Toxics Initiative
    • Water Quality
    • Bay Tours
    • Community Outreach
  • Get Involved
    • Report Pollution
    • Speak Out
    • Volunteer
    • Donate
    • Membership
    • Stay Informed
  • Contact Us
  • News
    • Latest
    • Press

News

Shark Fin Ban Awaits Governor's Signature

Details
Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times
Latest
Created: 10 September 2011

9/10/11

For sharks, life at the top of the ocean food chain is becoming safer — at least from human predators. 

The last 12 months have seen a flurry of laws, regulations and industry actions to end the international trade in the age-old delicacy, including bans on shark fin sales in Hawaii, Oregon, Washington and parts of Canada.

Last week, the California Senate also voted to ban the sale or possession of shark fins — a billion-dollar global trade that has led to the brutal deaths of tens of millions of sharks a year and resulted in many open-ocean shark species being threatened with extinction. The Bahamas and Honduras have prohibited shark fishing in the last two years.

“We’re really enthusiastic to see good things finally starting to happen for sharks,” said Elizabeth Wilson, a marine wildlife expert at Oceana, a nonprofit conservation group that has long campaigned against the trade.

Shark fins are used to make a coveted Chinese banquet soup that can sell for over $100 a bowl. It has the ceremonial mystique of benefiting health and virility, and serving it to guests is considered to be a sign of great honor and respect.

In an increasingly prosperous Asia, the market for the soup has grown drastically, causing overfishing around the globe. The presence of the once-common hammerhead in large parts of the western Atlantic, for example, has decreased by up to 89 percent over the last 25 years.

The spate of new protections is a result of efforts by environmental groups to reduce market demand for shark fins, because international treaties have failed to adequately curb shark fishing.

The Food Network recently removed all shark recipes from its offerings, and the celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay has been pressing Chinese restaurants in London to renounce the soup this year.

Shark populations cannot tolerate intensive fishing because sharks have few offspring and often do not reproduce until they are over 10 years old. Even by conservative estimates, more than 10 million shark fins moved through Hong Kong in 2008, the main distribution center for the trade. Fins sell for over $300 a pound.

Many marine biologists support tougher regulation of shark fishing itself.

“These bans go part way, but you’re still allowed to fish sharks without a permit,” said John Bruno, a marine ecologist at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. “In North Carolina, there are shark derbies for fun, where they are hung by their tails. We think it’s O.K. to do that with this ocean predator, but we wouldn’t dream of doing it to a terrestrial animal like a bear.”

The California ban, which has passed both chambers and now goes to Gov. Jerry Brown, would have a major impact on the availability of shark fins in the United States because most are imported from Hong Kong via California. The legislation bans imports as of Jan. 1, 2012, but allows those who possess shark fins to dispose of their stocks until June 30, 2013.

Though one of the bill’s sponsors is Paul Fong, a Chinese-born assemblyman from Sunnyvale, some Asian-Americans in the state have objected that the measure is discriminatory, singling out an important cultural tradition. But some surveys have shown that 70 percent of Asian-Americans in California support the bill.

 

Read More

 

 

 

SF Baykeeper Oil Spill Funding Bill Passes Senate and Assembly

Details
Deb Self, San Francisco Baykeeper
Latest
Created: 09 September 2011

9/8/11

After a long fight, both the California Senate and Assembly have passed AB 1112 to provide much-needed funding for oil spill prevention and response measures in California. Introduced by Assemblymember Jared Huffman and sponsored by San Francisco Baykeeper, the bill will now head to the Governor to be signed into law.

The budget for California's Office of Spill Prevention and Response was set for huge cuts because oil companies were fighting a modest increase in fees to fund the program. The bill will raise the fee 1.5 cents on a barrel of oil and fund protections for the Bay and coastlines statewide.

 

For more info on AB 1112, Click HERE.

 

 

California Coastal Commission Appoints New Director

Details
Sarah Christie, California Coastal Commission
Latest
Created: 09 September 2011

9/8/11

The California Coastal Commission has voted unanimously to appoint Dr. Charles Lester to the position of Executive Director, effective today. Dr. Lester has been serving as the Acting Executive Director since former Director Peter Douglas announced his retirement in August.

Dr. Lester will become the fourth E.D. to lead the Commission since its creation in 1972 with the passage of Proposition 20. Prior to his appointment, Charles served as Senior Deputy Director of the Commission, holding that position since 2006. His employment at the Commission began in 1997. Previously, Dr. Lester was an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Dr. Lester received his Ph.D in Jurisprudence and Social Policy from the University of California at Berkeley. In addition, he earned his J.D. at Boalt Hall School of Law and a B.A. in Geochemistry from Columbia University.
“The entire Commission recognized and appreciates the unique experience, unwavering integrity, and clear vision Dr. Lester brings to this position. While Peter Douglas leaves very large shoes to fill, Charles fits into them quite comfortably,” said Commission Chair Mary Shallenberger.

Dr. Lester takes the helm of an agency with 142 authorized staff positions and an annual budget of approximately $16 million.

Upon accepting the appointment, Dr. Lester emphasized the ongoing importance Californians place on protecting coastal resources and coastal access. He also acknowledged the importance of improving communications and collaboration with public agencies and local governments along the coast to achieve the purposes of the Coastal Act. He thanked Peter Douglas for his unprecedented leadership and cited the deep dedication and professional skills of the Commission’s staff.

“I am deeply committed to implementing the Coastal Act, but I am also a problem-solver, and I look forward to bringing people together around environmentally sustainable solutions that protect coastal resources and provide maximum public access to the coast for all Californians.”

 

Download the Press Release

Part of Arcata's coastal plan approved

Details
Jessica Cejnar, Times Standard
Latest
Created: 09 September 2011

9/9/11

A dispute that arose between Arcata city officials and the California Coastal Commission over the city's coastal plan in August was settled Thursday.

Commissioners unanimously approved the portion of the city's Local Coastal Program that deals with land use regulations in Arcata's coastal zone, but at the city's request commissioners did not vote on the portion of the program that deals with how development occurs.

The commission's decision gives the Arcata City Council six more months to review changes coastal commission staff asked it to make to its coastal program in August. The city will use that time to work on the development portion of its Local Coast Program, said Community Development Director Larry Oetker.

”We felt like if we could get our land use plan approved we were 50 percent of the way there,” he said. “And then we can come back and work on our implementation plan.”

The commission's decision comes after the Arcata City Council voted on a resolution Wednesday in favor of the changes commission staff recommended to the land use portion of the program, according to Bob Merrill, the commission's North Coast District manager. In addition to requesting more time to review all of the recommended changes, city officials also believe the changes they agreed to make to the Local Coastal Program are consistent with the California Coastal Act, Merrill said. 

The changes Arcata agreed to address were sea level rise, tsunami hazards, storm water management, wetlands, public access and recreation and visual resources, Oetker said. 

Jennifer Kalt, Humboldt Baykeeper's citizen water monitoring coordinator, said during public comments that she was concerned about the proposed change to the Local Coastal Program that addressed the California Coastal Trail. In McKinleyville, there are signs pointing people to the Hammond Trail portion of the California Coastal Trail, she said. But when the trail crosses into Arcata there are no signs directing people.

”As we know in the current economic climate, it's necessary to have this in the LCP or it's not going to happen,” she said.

Arcata's Director of Environmental Services Mark Andre said the city already has planned a coastal trail through Arcata. The trail will be paid for by a Coastal Conservancy grant, and the environmental study process has begun.

 

 

Read More


 

Senators need to stand up for California's oil spill prevention program

Details
San Jose Mercury News
Latest
Created: 09 September 2011

9/1/11

The fight over whether to maintain California's oil-spill response and prevention program is a classic Sacramento showdown pitting Big Oil against public safety and the environment.

State senators hoping for fat campaign checks from Exxon, BP and other oil companies are trying to, in effect, kill the system started in 1990 in the wake of the catastrophic Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska. Did these people sleep through the BP oil rig disaster that devastated the Gulf Coast waters and economy just last year?

Another vote on AB 1112 will take place in the Senate by the end of next week, and this time, it must pass. Gov. Jerry Brown should be calling up senators and reading the riot act.

California's tanker safety program is funded today by a 5-cents-per-barrel fee on oil transported into the state. The program has been effective: The amount of oil spilled here is down 95 percent since 1990. But new laws passed after the tanker Cosco Busan crashed into the Bay Bridge in 2007 added to the workload of the Office of Spill Prevention and Response, while inflation has continued to drive up costs. The agency is doing less today, and without the additional 1.75 cents per barrel proposed in AB 1112, layoffs will be inevitable. Vigilance and the ability to respond quickly to a spill will decline.

Make no mistake: This is not about money. The increase would be a fraction of a penny per gallon, not even a blip for oil companies raking in billions. This is about weakening regulation so that companies can cut corners on safety.

Some lawmakers say the safety system could be more efficient, but most of the changes they suggest are pushed by lobbyists from BP and other oil companies.

The bill authored by Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, passed his own house easily, as the Mercury News' Paul Rogers reported this week. But Tuesday in the Senate, it fell four votes short of passage, with 17 yes votes, 14 no and nine who took a pass and didn't vote at all. These are the senators who should be most ashamed.

Their most likely motivation is wanting to avoid either offending Big Oil with a yes vote or angering voters with a no.

State Sen. Leland Yee of San Francisco was the most surprising bystander for Tuesday's vote, but he now says he'll support AB 1112. He ought to be helping to round up votes. He wants to be mayor of San Francisco, which saw firsthand the devastation of the Cosco Busan spill.

Another surprise was state Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Los Angeles, who chairs the Senate's committee on energy and has stood up for closer scrutiny of PG&E -- speaking of companies that can't be trusted to place public safety above profits.

And a disappointment was state Sen. Sam Blakeslee, R-San Luis Obispo, who represents parts of Santa Clara County and a huge swath of the California coast. Blakeslee, a former Exxon employee, has sworn he's not in the pocket of big oil, and this would be a perfect way to show it. He and his waffling colleagues need to get off the fence and vote for this bill on the next try.

And be proud of it.

 

Read Original Article and View Slideshow

 

Aug. 30 Sacramento Bee editorial by Dennis Takahashi-Kelso, Executive Vice President of the Ocean Conservancy.

 


 

More Articles …

  1. Oiled Pelican Update
  2. Community forums on Eel River recovery
  3. California's coasts need another Peter Douglas
  4. The legacy of California's protector of the coast

Latest

Press

Page 151 of 195
  • Start
  • Prev
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • Next
  • End

Advanced Search

Current Projects

  • Mercury in Local Fish & Shellfish
  • Nordic Aquafarms
  • Offshore Wind Energy
  • Sea Level Rise
  • 101 Corridor
  • Billboards on the Bay
  • Dredging
  • Advocacy in Action
  • Our Supporters
Report A Spill
California Coastkeeper
Waterkeeper Alliance
Copyright © 2026 Humboldt Waterkeeper. All Rights Reserved.