Latest

Chinook smash record at Eel River's Van Arsdale

12/24/10

The number of salmon seen in parts of the Eel River this year have dwarfed that in any other year since the 1940s.

All across the watershed, people have reported big numbers of salmon moving in to spawn. There's no official tally of fish anywhere but at the Van Arsdale Fisheries Station, but fish lovers and biologists are saying the run -- which is now tapering down -- was impressive.

At Van Arsdale, the previous record for chinook salmon was 1,754 in 1986-1987.

This year: 2,313, and a few more may trickle in.

”A lot of people are impressed with the numbers of chinook we've seen,” said Fish and Game Associate Fisheries Biologist Scott Harris. “What I'm really impressed with is this is a 100 percent wild population.”

There's no way to accurately correlate the numbers seen at Van Arsdale with the rest of the watershed. But Harris said that there were reports of big numbers of salmon running up the Van Duzen River -- perhaps more than in 20 years -- and in other areas. Fish watchers on the South Fork of the Eel River also reported an impressive run.

The number of jacks at Van Arsdale is also far above last year's total of 139. Jacks are 2-year-old fish that return early to spawn, and are often a good indicator of the health of the following year's run. To date, there have been 746 chinook jacks at Van Arsdale.

Steelhead are faring only slightly better than last year's run at this time, but that run is just getting under way. At Van Arsdale, 17 steelhead have been counted, compared to 10 last year at this time. Steelhead numbers at Van Arsdale have fluctuated widely, reaching a high of 7,679 in 1960-1961, falling to just a handful in the early 1990s, and holding at about 250 per year since then. Last year's steelhead count was 324.

Coho salmon are rarely seen at Van Arsdale anymore, though estimates of their numbers in the early 1900s were in the tens of thousands. Estimated historic runs of chinook salmon and steelhead in the entire watershed were between 100,000 and 800,000, according to a 2010 report by the University of California at Davis Center for Watershed Sciences that was commissioned by California Trout.

Heavy logging, water diversions, commercial fishing, invasive species and dams that block spawning habitat have all been implicated in the declines. Chinook, coho and steelhead are federally protected, which has led to regulations on logging, fishing and gravel extraction.

Harris said that a wet spring will probably help young salmon avoid predatory pike minnows on their way out to sea, and mean better survival.

Read Full Article

Court upholds Southern California storm water runoff standards

12/15/10

A state appeals court ruled Tuesday that Los Angeles and Ventura counties can enforce water-quality standards designed to protect the region's beaches from polluted runoff, regardless of the cost to local governments and contractors.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal overturned a 2008 ruling in favor of Arcadia, 20 other Los Angeles County cities and a building industry association, who sought to overturn the storm-water pollution regulations by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board because the agency did not consider their economic impact on construction projects.

Several environmental groups -- Natural Resources Defense Council, Santa Monica Baykeeper and Heal the Bay -- intervened to challenge that ruling. This week they celebrated its reversal as a victory for the health of Southern California beaches, where fouled storm water is a major source of pollution.

"This decision will protect millions of people who use local beaches and water resources throughout Southern California and assures that science remains the focus when these standards are developed,” said David Beckman, water quality program director for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The consortium of cities, including Arcadia, Carson, Claremont, Downey, Glendora and Whittier, joined the Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation in 2005 to file suit against the State Water Board and the L.A. regional board, saying the treatment control structures to meet its storm-water quality regulations for metals, bacteria, trash and other contaminants were prohibitively expensive to install.

In the 29-page opinion issued Tuesday, the appeals court found the state was required to adopt measures to control water pollution under the federal Clean Water Act.

Richard Montevideo, attorney for the plaintiffs, said he was disappointed by the ruling, which he said was "cursory and did not do justice to the case."

"Our position was and remains that they have to consider whether these standards can reasonably be achieved -- what the economic impacts are," he said. "A lot of these requirements are just not feasible. In some cases it doesn’t matter how much money you spend."

Montevideo said he would confer with the cities in the suit to determine whether they would ask for the case to be heard by the California Supreme Court.

Read Full Article

Wild coho salmon run in Marin County renews hope

12/17/10

One of the last runs of wild coho salmon in California has surged into the Lagunitas Creek watershed in western Marin County , bringing renewed hope to fisheries experts, watershed managers and those who have devoted their lives to salmon procreation.

The endangered fish had all but disappeared over the past two years, creating fear among biologists that the species was in the midst of a death spiral. Then, during rains this past week, the fish arrived and began laying eggs in the creek and tributaries, which wind through the lush San Geronimo Valley.

Biologists with the Salmon Protection and Watershed Network, or SPAWN, the Marin Municipal Water District and the National Park Service counted 55 coho and 30 egg nests, or redds, in Lagunitas and San Geronimo creeks and in Devil's Gulch over the past week.

"That's the most that we've seen in a single week in three years," said Eric Ettlinger, the aquatic ecologist for the water district. "After two terrible years for coho, it's a relief to have more fish returning to Lagunitas Creek, so I'm cautiously optimistic that we've seen the worst of the population decline."

Largest wild run

The Lagunitas watershed, which winds 33 miles through the picturesque redwood- and oak-studded valley on the northwest side of Mount Tamalpais, supports the largest wild run of coho salmon along the Central Coast and is considered a model for fisheries restoration around the state.

It is unique in that the primary spawning grounds are in the middle of developed communities. Some 40 percent of the coho in the watershed are hatched in tributaries surrounded by homes, golf courses, roads and horse corrals in the 9-square-mile San Geronimo Valley

Coho in Central California were listed as endangered in 2005 under the Endangered Species Act. The Lagunitas is considered by fisheries biologists to be the last true refuge for wild coho on the Central Coast. There are bigger runs elsewhere - especially after the dramatic decline over the past two years - but many of the coho in other places were raised in hatcheries.

Run still below average

Marin's wild coho took their time this year - they usually swim up the creek during the first rains - and even though their undulating figures can be seen over the gravel beds, the numbers are well below average for this time of year.

Last winter, 67 live fish and 51 redds were spotted during spawning season. The year before that, 43 fish and 26 redds were counted. Those two years are the worst on record.

In 2004-05, 1,342 coho were seen in the watershed. Those fish left 496 egg nests. The average since 1995 is 524 fish and 217 redds in Lagunitas Creek and its tributaries.

While the fish now in the creek are encouraging to water and fisheries managers, not everyone is so optimistic.

"We are down to the end of the line," Todd Steiner, the executive director of SPAWN, said. "Despite better than average rainfall and early rainfall, which is normally good for coho, we didn't see fish until about two weeks ago. The National Marine Fishery Service is saying we're in an extinction vortex. We're at the now-or-never point."

Read Full Article

State should follow San Jose's lead on plastic bag ban

12/17/10

San Jose's ban on plastic bags will help our local creeks, estuaries, parks and highways, which now are littered with billions of bags that never make it to the recycling plant. But what we really need is a statewide law.

The 10-1 City Council vote Tuesday makes San Jose the largest city in the nation to implement a ban. Starting in 2012, single-use plastic bags will be allowed only in restaurants. Stores will have to charge 10 cents for a paper bag, although shoppers on public assistance won't have to pay.

This should encourage the use of reusable totes and stop at least a small portion of the 90 billion plastic bags Americans use every year -- 3.8 billion in the Bay Area alone -- from choking wildlife and fouling public spaces. It's estimated that 1 million bags a year end up in San Francisco Bay.

San Francisco, Oakland and Palo Alto, among others, have passed bans, while Sunnyvale, Fremont, Marin County, Santa Clara County and others are considering similar laws. Good for them -- but a statewide ban is what we need.

It would do the most for the environment, but it also would conserve local government resources and save businesses the expense of complying with a patchwork of regulations. That's partly why grocery stores got behind AB 1998 earlier this year. It passed the Assembly in the summer but died in the Senate after an intense lobbying campaign by the plastic bag industry.

Given the power of lobbyists in Sacramento, local laws may be the best we can do for now. But, fortunately, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger isn't giving up. He's encouraging the Legislature to pass a ban before he leaves office. A lame duck governor doesn't have much sway, but he's right on this.

Read Full Article

San Jose City Council approves plastic bag ban

12/14/10

SAN JOSE, Calif.—Paper or plastic?

That's a question shoppers won't hear in San Jose starting in 2012, when plastic bags will be banned in California's third largest city.

KTVU-TV reports that the San Jose City Council voted 10-1 Tuesday to ban single-use plastic bags and bar retailers from giving away paper ones.

The ordinance requires stores to charge 10 cents for paper bags in 2012 and 25 cents in 2013 to encourage shoppers to use reusable sacks.

San Jose joins San Francisco and several other California cities in banning plastic bags, which environmentalists say clutter the environment and harm wildlife.

But some shoppers say plastic bags are useful and they can't afford to buy reusable or paper bags.

Read Full Article